Like the 390 and 290 are only 5% diff performance but with 150-200 dollar differance in price.If you have pure money Intel/Nvidia but for most us poor gamers I thin AMD/ATI is by far better, If you dont play WOT and play games that are not flash based brpowerser style.Īslo Mard have you noticed WOT also seems to be way more choppy looing at say 45 FPS than most games? In most games at 40 FPS I was happy as a clam but until I get 55+ My eye gets bothered to the point I spend more time modding than playing Like buying the okder gen cards that are repackaged as the new series. As a whole for 150-250 $ graphics cards that I think most people buy ATI cards are usually just as good and in some cases much better bang. I find that when I use AA at all it nails my FPS 30%.Īnd to the other guys, AMD makes up for its lack Hyperthread with multicores and does it in most games very well.
Have you messe with the FXXA mods at all? They inject FXXA and are not suposed to hurt fps more than 3% while they look massively better. Next thing I'd turn down is post processing and decals. If you have problems running my settings try turning TSSAA to FXAA or lowering shadow and lighting quality or turning off shadows. Using the High preset tends to chalk up extra graphical settings that really hamper the CPU and I've found setting "extra effects quality" above medium does look impressive will seriously hamper your framerate in combat when it's most important your framerate remain stable.
It gives me a good mix of graphical quality and performance when it counts. T_J try changing your settings and see if it helps to run something closer to what I run.